Harland of the Winter

 

It was March. The drabness of winter droned on. The sky stayed gray, the air cold, the grass a yellow-brown. The extended weather report looked grim. His body ached for lack of muscle movement, exercise, freedom. He longed for the embrace of a balmy warmth. But that didn’t seem to be in the cards, not for a while at least.

 

The government mess also droned on. The cure was at hand, always at hand. Saboteurs were everywhere, groaning and whining and making us feel heavy with their fantasy drivel. He longed for a lull in the snivel-bag lolly jargon, but that too would have to wait.

 

A prayer, uttered in low tones, went out; a bow to the unseen power that was the ever-present origin. A body, too Earth-laden to feel the subtle energies, stayed in its ethereal presence; yearning, hoping. Faith remained hitched to interiority. The optimistic aura, imbued with a golden hue, arranged itself like a coif, secured by a wimple. A plaintive mew ascended, descended, as a tincture of grace might do.

 

And the morning light had not yet manifested. This was the hour, the monk’s hour, of less brainwave interference and chatter to impede the spirit. It was the morning that re-calibrated the mind, complementing a restive sleep recharge. In waves of devotion, alpha-delta-gamma-theta; curative frequencies came to the rescue.

 

Harland had barely recovered from yesterday’s ennui. Yet here he was, back at it again. The battle raged daily. The bottle sat down on the floor by the corner of his desk, a snort to be had in case of snake bite. It didn’t phase him in the least to think that the unseen war would be fought yet again. His battleground was his private study, wherein he laid the snares and hooked riders from their horses before they could joust. It was a game, but it was serious too.

 

Harland mused, How mysterious are the Middle Ages. They’re called the “Dark Ages.” And yet, he thought, there was lots of good stuff happening then, wasn’t there? Harland made a note to investigate further. Wouldn’t it just be like the usual hijinks of the System to cover up the most fertile phase of our Western past? Yes, I will have to look into the so-called “Dark Ages”; the Roundtable of King Arthur and all that.

 

It was complete, for now; his early rumination. The trap was set to snare the unwary forest gremlins and human soul-forms that wanted to know, who need more info-wisdom. And he, perhaps the least worthy among them.

 

Harland looked at the time. The cycle of time came in micro-bursts and made daily routine what it was. Still, the greater story lay in the macro-bigland cycles of time, covered up but there none-the-less.

 

The poet-warrior’s duty is to make everything known; to unwrap it all like a birthday or Christmas present—such thoughts scuttered about. It was a gift and as gladly given as received.

 

He scratched his head and gave it a rest. There would be more to say, more to tell…and there was time, at least for now, to tease it all apart.      

Preparing the Ground

 

The final freeze of winter was upon the states as Harland’s mind reeled. He pulled down a special book from his shelf: European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages by Ernst Robert Curtius. This landmark tome was originally published in German in 1948 and the Bollingen series first brought out the English translation in 1953. In it, the author (from the back cover) “examines the continuity of European literature from Homer to Goethe, with particular emphasis on the Latin Middle Ages.” He would immerse himself in this over the coming weeks. Hopefully, this might properly situate him for his nosedive into the so-called Dark Ages.

 

In the meantime Harland’s thoughts turned wistfully to the 20^th Century. The darkness of those years still casts a long shadow onto the present age. Of particular interest are the years that witnessed the rise of Hitler and the machinations of the Third Reich. This era, roughly 1933-1945, cannot be discussed without triggering strong emotions built upon the foundation of a carefully crafted “narrative of evil.”

 

Simultaneously, one cannot conjure the “Hun” without the “Jap”; it becomes next to impossible for people to disconnect the German from the Japanese front, to consider them in pure isolation, without using arguments about the one to bolster conventional narratives about the other. That is the nature of the beast about to be encountered. 

 

Still, if people can bracket their biases about Hitler, the so-called Nazis, and the conventional history of World War II, then they might learn from what Harland wished to lay out before them. In doing so, he would not be stating something very original. Yet the sense of this, his own discordant-yet-plausible notions, was something that needed to be said, and said in his own way. And though he knew, as always, he was no “expert” in these matters, something told him that he perceived a truth about the subject matter. This “truth” was only a cloud of suspicion, of clues. But these clung to one another to present some vague-yet-palpable sense. He would set it out as best he could, while knowing all along that people are not really able to let go of their ingrained biases and confusion.

 

However, what follows will not enhance his reputation; it will likely have the opposite effect. They and he will be rejected, become ostracized, laughed at, ridiculed. Why?—because he will present mostly a summary of what he believes to be the case without bothering too much with details to buttress his conclusions. This is never wise. Just the same, Harland feels it needs to be laid bare. And though he starts with the afore-mentioned period, his primary concern is with its aftermath: that is, with the schizoid nature of German “fascism” as it relates to the projected ends of its evolutionary development. How might it have been “engineered” in order to fulfill those ends? Why? Who benefitted and how?

 

It is doubtful that we uninitiated can ever know the full story of what Harland is about to lay out. By “uninitiated” he means those who were not then and are not now privy to and participant in the inner workings of those involved, both overtly and covertly, in that historical period.

 

There is always a back-story to that which is made explicit for public consumption. And so the reach of the “players” in this drama goes far back behind those who are known (and known properly!) to historians. For this reason, “details” are not presented and would do little, anyway, to aid the counter-narrative. Why?—because details, like the author, can always be (and are) ridiculed and marginalized.

 

Think what you will, offers Harland, but I will not be silenced!

 

He begins.

 

The historical drama he is about to discuss is both simple and complex: simple, in that there is a basic duality in play between good and evil; complex in that, as polar compliments, there are also intertwining and hard-to-discern qualities, presumptions and motivations that inhere among and between this duality of good and evil, and that disguise themselves within each. If you subscribe to the “one side bad, the other side good” notion, you might as well stop reading and go back to sleep; accept what has been drilled into you and forget Harland and his opinions altogether.

 

He is not promoting some brand of ethical/moral relativism, not at all. Instead, this Harland fellow suggests that to really apprehend his message likely requires a new mutation of consciousness. And he hesitates to use the term integral consciousness because it is an overused term that, as a result, has lost much of its currency, its meaning. But a new consciousness is required that goes beyond the mental/rational (the “mental deficient”) that sees things  merely as opposites. Neither can one rely solely on binary compliments, as applies to mythical consciousness, in order to comprehend what is about to be discussed. Perhaps what he is straining to say here will become clearer as he proceeds. 

 

With this esoteric caveat in mind, Harland now attempts to go at it and go at it he will. 

Aligned Interests Set the Stage

 

The German people were never conquered by Rome. There is a scene in the film Gladiator depicting the troops of Marcus Aurelius confronting a ragtag German army. It is telling. Although these ancient Germans are shown as being defeated here, they were never completely subdued as a People.

 

Any peoples outside the influence of the Roman Empire were considered “barbarians.” And once the barbarian hordes appeared at the gates in the early centuries of the Common Era, Rome would be absorbed by them. (It is comparable to what is happening in Western European nations today as a result of uncontrolled, illegal migration by Muslim invaders who are somehow allowed entry into their unprotected borders—an old trick and a not-so-subtle type of warfare.)

 

The German folk were a proud and independent race. A thousand years later, the German princes were the ones who stood up to the corruption and abuses of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. They offered asylum to Martin Luther. And so it can be said that they twice stood up to Rome and refused to back down.

 

In the run-up to the 20^th Century, the Germanic peoples were champions in the world. Intelligent, industrious, no-nonsense, disciplined, hard-working and still fiercely covetous of their liberty, they represented a power with which to be reckoned. In education, art, philosophy, industry, military prowess, Germany was next to none. Efficiently organized and rationally ordered they were the epitome of white, Protestant, Northern European civilization. Given their national success and geographic location Germany consequently was a target for all those who were both envious and fearful of their power.

 

Who were envious and fearful of Germany at the dawn of the 20^th Century? Before we address this question there is something more essential to ask.

 

This jockeying around for political and economic dominance must be examined. What was driving the unstoppable geo-political urge to power at this time? In a sense, by trying to answer this question we shall find ourselves bordering on the realm of science fiction.

 

Science, technology, industry were being unleashed at the turn of the century just as corporate multinational consciousness was ascendant; material wealth, governmental tinkering, business and money, banking and finance—all of these forces were roiling into a confluence at the very time that both jurisprudence and religious institutions were falling apart at the seams.

 

Throughout this materialist jumble of interests, an insidious evil lurked; Luciferian influence infiltrated all and everything, from the workings of organizations to the inner drives of individual minds and our collective unconscious. There was an untethering of the moral/ethical from the practical/logical; a zealous and certain populace came to identify with its own national, linguistic and cultural roots. To this was joined a common acceptance of a consensual reality that deemed work, career, money, position, and shared social values as standard, normal, and systematized. One might view this as a "sloughing off" of spiritual values from the everyday, commonplace lives of European peoples.

 

Behind this “modernization of the human mind” was a print and broadcast media that was hugely instrumental in organizing things via its advertising, public relations, image-making, and directed propagandizing. The written word and visual arts were now entering their heyday, weaponized and applied as needed, when needed. (This stunning, untethered and seemingly autonomous “techno-crazing” would continue to intensify, to assault and to overtake the fullness of our human measure into the next millennium.)

 

The 20th Century tumult can really be traced to the overturning of the ancien régime (in the very broadest sense of the term), viz., the regime-changing revolutions around 1848 that effectively upended all of the monarchies of Europe. The American War of Northern Aggression in the 1860s and the Bolshevik derailment of Russia in 1917 were also cornerstones laid into the formative backdrop.  

 

But at the beginning of the 20^th Century our analysis focuses on what the Great Powers were all vying for: control.

 

The People want safety, comfort and security; leaders in their respective governments played on this common, materialistic human drive of the citizenry. After all, are not the lowest rungs on Maslow’s hierarchy a prerequisite to the fostering of human life, liberty and happiness? Was it not the state’s duty to preserve the Peoples’ ability to survive, nurture and maintain families whose individuals can then strive for the higher aspirations toward the top of this very same hierarchy of needs: self-esteem, self-realization? At least the state's ostensible protection of this possibility for their constituents was a good cover for it to exercise its Machiavellian machinations. And the state, forever seduced by its own power, easily falls prey to fortifying and preserving its falsely perceived pre-eminence over its own People.

 

To answer the questions posed above, this furthering of each country’s national interest (as defined by its respective power brokers) was driving the unstoppable geo-political urge to power; and those who were envious and fearful of Germany at the dawn of the 20^th Century were the Bolsheviks and soon-to-be-Soviets, the French, the English, Poland and Czechoslovakia; the Rothschild banking dynasty within these nations; the Freemason-Illuminati contingent and other secret societies also entrenched within; the corrupted Church of Rome and certain depraved royal bloodlines were also very connected up within all of the above.

 

We must mention also the Zionist drive that was gathering momentum for a homeland, eyeing Palestine (ancient Judea and surrounding tribes) which would be called “Israel.” America was seen as a plum prize whose wealth, resources, and growing might could be manipulated to the advantage of those nations lining up against Germany. Switzerland, while officially neutral, was supportive of Germany, as were Spain, Italy and Turkey. These were the big players back then and are all that really matter, at least for Harland's discourse herein. 

 

In other words, the institutionalized "gang warfare" that was soon to erupt had an obvious outer aspect (exoteric duality) and an inner, hidden aspect (esoteric polarity); the nations aligned either as "Axis" or "Ally," but within each "side" and under the radar were those covert interests whose loyalty was to neither side but only to themselves as self-profiting and self-perpetuating, secret entities.

 

The Middle East was becoming important around this time as well. As soon as steam power was replaced by diesel and gasoline-powered engines and the automobile came into existence, the race was on! The big gang-bangs-to-come would be called World Wars I and II. (And they would be followed by lots of lower level “military actions,” but we must not get ahead of ourselves.)

 

Suffice it to say that as the early 20^th Century got underway, powerful forces were aligned against Germany. It was the new kid on the global block and it had a mind all its own. This, itself, was a threat to the order that had been organizing since the forced dissolution of ruling European monarchs. The other foe of this new order was real Christianity: devotion to the cross and to the gospel of Jesus. As Harland saw it, this new order was nothing short of a Luciferian materialist cabal that was pushing war against Germany, and Zionist-funded Communists (in various guises) would be the tip of the spear meant to obliterate the old order, the ancien régime—and with it, any and all sense of traditional lifeways.

 

Hint: It has been asserted, tellingly, that Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were all 32-degree Freemasons. If true, these leaders were all Zio-lackies, servitors to the Communist cause of world control and domination. Whatever is said about Hitler and the Third Reich, it is in this sense that it can be seen as the countervailing force to this newly-borne world order. As such, Germany and its People can be viewed as a Christian nation, perhaps in search of its occult pagan roots, but none-the-less not run by Freemasons and Communist-sympathizers.

 

In retrospect the whole international intrigue of the 20^th Century is like a science fiction drama in which fantastic role playing transcended and suppressed true motives and disguised the real humanity on both "sides" to the conflict. The hollow bluster about "freedom" from the Allies would echo throughout WWII; and any and all accomplishments of the Third Reich, specifically between 1933-1938, were buried by the Allies' narrative of the "brutal and evil Hun."

 

In any case, and in very general terms, the stage was now set for the atrocities and dissimulation that were about to begin—profitable wars that would tear down the past, literally and figuratively, in order to make way for a tasteless modernity, a leftist-ideology-gone-wild, and a furthering of the Luciferian agenda.

Demonize, Then Provoke

 

Myths and stories about Adolf Hitler abound: his origins, his bloodline, his WWI war record; his alleged racial and religious biases, occult interests, romantic liaisons; his alleged criminal acts, health quirks, drug use, mental fatigue, and eventual incapacitation; and his purported escape from Berlin—all of this and more can be found in the public domain. The man, his life and his deeds are the objects of endless fascination, of speculation, pro and con, whether true or false.

 

Hitler was no angel. As a head of state he acted the role of secular overseer whose temptations to abuse his power were sometimes his own failings, as in when he ordered the assassination of a rival, Gregor Strasser. At other times there were abuses committed by others who thought it their province to divine the Führer’s intentions and desires, as in the attacks upon and murders of civilians during wartime. As a secular leader, Hitler should be judged against those secular standards as exemplified by the deeds of other national leaders of his time, viz., Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt and Eisenhower.

 

Hitler was certainly unorthodox. As such, he was not considered to be a “member of the club,” the club being those who are groomed and installed into their positions based upon “establishment norms.” Even those in his own political party may very well have doubted his capacity to be an appropriate leader. (Author Joseph Farrell presents evidence to suggest that Rudolf Hess’s solo flight into Britain was a mission to both conclude a treaty with the peace faction outside the ambit of the Churchill government and, as a condition thereof, was part of a larger coup to remove Hitler from power.) 

 

Despite being cut from a different cloth, Hitler received support from the likes of Henry Ford, Herbert Walker Bush, and Wall Street speculators. Antony C. Sutton has done an admirable job of proving this in his books (just as he proved who the financiers were behind the Bolshevik revolution).

 

Even without any such evidence, common sense informs one that any discerning person in the 1920s and ‘30s who found Communism offensive would naturally be drawn toward supporting any enemy of Communism, and Hitler’s government was most definitely anti-Communist. (By the way, the term “Nazi” was a moniker imposed by critics of National Socialist Germany and was meant as a slur. The philological root of the term is believed to be of ancient provenance. But as far as we know, Germans of the Third Reich did not refer to themselves as “Nazis.”)

 

During his early tenure (1933-1938) Hitler reinvigorated the German People. He brought them from the dung heap of a calculated moral debauchery and the ashes of WWI to a new and vibrant prosperity. The People loved him for that; they were given back their health and dignity, and were infused with pride in themselves as a People and a nation. These were the golden years of Hitler’s rule.

 

He called it “National Socialism.” This term has been the focus of debate ever since: was the “socialism” bit simply a ruse to draw in those masses who were more on the left at the time? Or was it an overt bow to an unholy alliance and fusion of the state and corporate business that defined for the ages exactly what “right wing fascism” meant? Here we are presented with an “either/or,” a dualist dichotomy and asked to make a choice. Could the truth be somewhere in between? Or something else altogether? By whatever measure, was it a just administration? If so or if not—compared to what?  

 

In retrospect, we know that the fascist definition underlined above fits that of Communism, whose adherents were and are today amoral fascists in their strategies and tactics. Was branding National Socialism “right wing fascism” simply the typical Communist ploy of accusing their enemies of the very same despotism of which they themselves are guilty? Harland thinks so. General Patton thought we were fighting the wrong enemy and should have been fighting the Soviets. (After he said this his neck was soon broken in an odd motor vehicle accident and he was killed. Hmmm)

 

Powerful nation-states make determinations regarding other nation-states. How this is done, via which back channels, is a study in and of itself. But once they decide another state presents an unacceptable risk to them, a highly organized campaign is begun to discredit and demonize that state’s leader and/or to demoralize its people. We see this all the time. When conceiving of any war or even a coup, this is considered necessary in order to garner the support of citizenry. (Note: This tactic is used by enemies today, both foreign and domestic.) Once the citizenry is sufficiently riled up, the process can then move on to the next phase.

 

Let us now consider the nature of provocation.

 

Have you ever taunted or cornered an animal? It will lash out. So will a person, unless he or she “turns the other cheek.” A provocation is an attack meant to induce the same or a similar response from whomever (or whatever) is being attacked.

 

There is a natural tendency to defend oneself or others when an attack upon one or the other occurs. It can be termed the law of retribution, a part of natural law. Governments have established diplomatic corps whose purpose is to use diplomatic means—dialogue and negotiation—to defuse attacks, so as to eliminate or at least minimize a resort to violence as the response between and among provoked nations. Such diplomacy is a formalization of natural law and has been codified into international norms, international law.

 

Provocations can be executed directly by means of the overt action of a state. Provocations can also be executed indirectly, by either a proxy (as is being done in Syria right now) or by the covert means of its own (rogue) intelligence agency (as, notes Harland, was done in the Parkland, Florida school shooting incident and in the Mandalay Bay shooting in Las Vegas).

 

After six or so years of peaceful co-existence, was Hitler’s Germany provoked into WWII? You be the judge. The severely oppressive terms of the Treaty of Versailles that were imposed on Germany were themselves a provocation. And there certainly were vicious attacks and chronic persecutions of Germans living within pockets of Poland and Czechoslovakia in the re-drawn map produced by the WWI victors. Provocations? You be the judge.

 

On the subject of international treaties—they are on the same footing as a nation’s constitution in that treaties, too, are the supreme law of the land. In republics they must be ratified by the representatives of the People. In America treaties require a two-thirds supermajority vote of the United States Senate in order to be lawful and enforceable. This underscores their tremendous legal power. In a dictatorship, treaties are simply executed at will by a tyrant, who can break them just as easily. Treaties, as with contracts generally, can always be broken as long as you are willing to pay the price for doing so.

 

Getting back to the art of provocation: Once a target is successfully provoked and reacts as expected, is the initiator justified in furthering its lethal action? If so, does war thus become “justified,” i.e., turn it into a “just" or "good war”?

 

We must, I suppose, consult the “Law of War.” This is found in a series of treaties called “conventions,” viz., the Geneva and Hague Conventions. But will the law divulge the facts and circumstances, the context of a provocation? No it will not; instead, it may be easily used as a weapon to justify wrongdoing or black operations, which, conveniently, are almost never thoroughly and rigorously investigated.

 

The next question to pose is whether belligerents who engage in war begin to lose their humanity, their moral compass—as individuals (leaders and soldiers), as members of battle groups (corps, companies, battalions, brigades), and as nations generally. We intuitively know the answer, but fleshing out why it's so and how it happens is another matter entirely.

War Casualties

 

War is hell. Most legal niceties are eclipsed by a wartime mentality. Whichever side you are on, each side commits war crimes; in war, each side will do whatever it wants to do if it thinks it can get away with it. War is a suspension of morality, ethics, good will toward men. It is a suspension of our humanity. Hell. (And as President Lincoln and General Andrew Jackson proved, the passions released by war can suspend rights that are guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.)

 

Despite official policy from the highest echelons of command, the military in combat does whatever it needs to do in order to win battles and to control the war effort. (Yet there are degrees of inhumanity engaged in by militarists, as will be further addressed below.) And there are some unlucky few in the military who are prosecuted to maintain the fiction of following the laws of war. It is primarily a façade.

 

As with all war, in the frantic, crazed milieu of World War II all emotions were let out of the bag. It is supremely difficult to control fear and hate once it has been whipped up and unleashed. And when destruction and killing can be accomplished without hand-to-hand combat—from the air, via tank, artillery piece, or from the barrel of a gun, it becomes just a function of another day on the job, following orders.

 

There was no so-called “Holocaust” of the Jews, as has been broadcast far and wide since the end of WWII. A total of perhaps 40,000 Jews died during the war, mostly in Eastern European labor camps. Many died of typhoid but a good many from deliberate killing. Still, there were no “ovens” or “gas chambers”; there was no organized “Final Solution.” All of this was made-up in order to victimize Jews and to instill shame and guilt in Germans and upon the rest of the world. All of these so-called “Holocaust memorials” are monumental lies based upon exaggeration and bluster, made possible by tons of money being poured into one, huge Judaic public relations effort.

 

Even before all of the bloodletting began, before war was declared between the main belligerents, “Judea” had already declared war on Germany. In other words the Jews had already declared themselves to be “enemy combatants.” As a result they would reap what they had sown. Their own law of retribution came back to bite them. And what was the reaction? Jews used their media influence worldwide to cry foul and claim victimhood. At the same time Zionist extremist plotters would delight in the expected “persecution by Nazis” knowing full well that this “sacrifice” would induce the necessary quantum of guilt to further their scheme for the founding of the planned nation-state of Israel.

 

The killing of Jews proceeded here and there as deemed (unlawfully) "necessary" for the war effort by local commanders. So-called “concentration camps” were slave labor camps. Those unfortunate Jews who ended up there were used as laborers. If they became useless as laborers they might be exterminated and in many cases they were. This was illegal and horrific but is not necessarily unusual in time of war.

 

Again, perhaps 40,000 Jews died from disease or murder, not six million; even the Holohoax has back-tracked on that ridiculously high number of “victims.” But of course by now the so-called “Holocaust” has become a religion for the Jews and if one refuses to worship at their false altar such heretics are accused of a hate crime, anti-Semitism, and might as well suffer the torments of being pariahs for the rest of their lives, if they are not actually thrown into prison. What a lovely mess it has all become, all for the love of victimhood.

 

The overwhelming proportion of Jews today are not the imagined Torah-abiding religionists. As far as I know Talmudism is what is preached in all synagogues these days. So today’s Jews are Talmudic-conditioned; Talmudism is Pharisaic Judaism based upon rabbinic “wisdom” coming down from even as far back as Babylon. Most of these were rabidly Christian-hating rabbis: Judaism’s Strange Gods.

 

Generally speaking, they did not then and do not today worship that same God of Moses. And the Talmud cannot be cleansed of its hate against non-Jews, especially that hate directed at the Christians, the “goyim,” and their beloved Jesus, Son of God. Talmudic Judaism teaches that the Blessed Virgin Mary is a whore and that Jesus is in hell, doomed to be boiled in excrement for eternity. What sort of “religion” preaches such things?—anti-Semitic or true? You be the judge. (And this is only the sacrilegious tip of what lies beneath the waterline of the Talmudic iceberg.) 

 

If there was retribution against Jews it was because Jewish bankers and businessmen financially vanquished Germany in the early 20^th Century. As they do in any nation, Jews exploit and deplete resources for their own avarice and feel no remorse toward what they do to non-Jews. Thanks to Bolshevik Jews, Weimar Berlin became the totally debauched capital of sexploitation. (And yes, these same extremists have a sordid history as Satanists who perform the murderous “blood libel rite” sacrifice upon kidnapped, Christian children.) And this near-sighted one-sidedness, blinds them from any sort of allegiance to society as a whole.

 

And so when there is a reaction against them for their predatory and lust-promoting behaviors Jews should not be surprised. Yet they are studied in putting on pretensions of shock and outrage. (And they publicly parade their multi-cultural charity and arts foundations in an effort to put a happy face onto more covert, inner workings.)

 

The Third Reich had had enough of Jews and debased secret societies assaulting the moral fiber of their nation. And when the occasion arose to call them out, as it did under Hitler, they were called to account for their misdeeds against the People. The official policy was not a “pogrom” against them as such, but at the street level there was an unstoppable rage, anger and resentment toward their filthy ways. Germans in particular abhor parasitical entities; they are a clean People. Such unclean, parasitical elements included all who despoiled and sponged off of society, including the Roma or Gypsies, and Freemason/Illuminati-type secret societies. The actions of extremist supremacist Jews were antithetical to Christian-held, love-thy-neighbor values, which were still held in high regard in the early 20^th Century by the German People.

 

Arguably, those with a more engrained Christian ethos are less likely to be the monsters in modern warfare. Harland maintains that, at least in World War II, the Christian sensibilities of the Germans won out when it came to adhering more closely to the laws of war; the brutal, Freemasonic sensibilities of Allied leaders stood out in stark contrast. And the militaries on each side took their orders (and cues) from those at the top of the chain of command. As such, World War II might be viewed as a combat between good (Christians) and evil (Luciferian/Kabbalist Freemasonry).

 

Gosh darn it, laments Harland, why didn’t someone tell our GIs about that?

 

In war, swift justice is meted out and that’s what was done by the Third Reich. Of course it is never pretty and easily gets out of control. And the worst “human rights abuses” were used to great propaganda effect by the “Allies.” Not to excuse such abuses but by way of explanation, this Allied strategy just goes to prove the power of media to sway and control public opinion.

 

Note that Western media did not report then, and do not report now, that numerous Jews were ensconced in the Third Reich's officer corps; neither do they report the multi-cultural, multi-racial troops accepted into German military service at that time. This, of course, goes against the "Aryan" narrative and thus cannot be made public. But go research it for yourself.

 

Neither has the Western media ever reported how Churchill was a war criminal. Not only was he responsible for fire-bombing and murdering hundreds of thousands of German civilians, earlier in his “career” he also advocated the gassing of civilians and machine-gunning them from the air. Look up his record as secretary of state in the 1920s in Mesopotamia, Afghanistan, Ireland, Kenya and India. As late as 1943, Churchill’s policies were instrumental in allowing six million Bengalis to starve to death. Anyone who rose up against the ambitions of the British Empire was fair game. How fittingly ironic then that Churchill was awarded with a Nobel Prize (for “literature,” viz., propaganda) And now, an actor (Gary Oldman) has been awarded an Oscar for his portrayal of him in the film Darkest Hour. Mainstream media is of course falling all over themselves with glee as they continue to promote the phony Churchill legacy.

 

Mater Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, purportedly said: “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.” Substitute “media and publishing” for “nation’s money supply” and there is a huge double whammy against the People—or today, substitute "educational system" or “science and medicine”—even “government.” The Jewish extremist supremacists have, as they ever have done, parlayed themselves into control. (As such, they should and would be added to those big nation-state players in WWII had they not instead been a dispersed and decentralized lot.) Today, thanks to their Church of the Holocaust, they now exercise control in every major area of human endeavor, either directly or via “non-Jew” Luciferian servitors.

 

The Germany of the ‘30s and early ‘40s sought to cut out the cancer from their society by closing the Jew's playhouse down. But the Jews, via their manipulation of the Anglo-American governments and militaries came back 1000 times stronger. These nations firebombed not just Dresden but many, many more German cities, killing at least hundreds of thousands of innocent (Christian) civilians. Talk about a holocaust! Guilt for this heinous war crime can primarily be burned into the blackened soul of Winston Churchill. (And in the Soviet Union, under the Jewish Bolshevik extremist supremacists, millions of Christians and their priests perished, all butchered.) This was Franklin Delano Roosevelt's kindly "Uncle Joe," as he so deceptively referred to Josef Stalin. 

 

Just after the war Eisenhower allowed perhaps a million German prisoners of war die of neglect, starvation and disease. It was known as Project Bluebird. They fared no better than those unlucky German soldiers captured by Stalin.

 

This is the real story of Hitler’s Third Reich and the clever, two-faced deceits of the Allies. Sorry if Harland’s analysis here seems shockingly bitter to swallow, cold or unfeeling. But when the People are fed up and the military takes control of the situation, all manner of distasteful but necessary things begin to happen. Still, these must be weighed in the balance of events and circumstance in order to arrive at the truth—and real facts yield truth.

 

Seek and ye shall find! exhorts Harland. 

 

So stop feeling guilt for what happened to less culpable Jews who had the crummy luck to get the boot by the Third Reich, due to the outlandish conduct of their extremist supremacist brethren. After all, Jewish leaders had already positioned the Jews as enemies of the German state.

 

Now Germany is a gelded and dispirited nation, worse off even than it was before WWII. Who feels the pain and anguish of the long-suffering German People? Today’s battlefield is the information flow on the Internet. So hold on—we have yet to hear the half of it...

Thinking, Choosing

 

Winter kept threatening another encore while making curtain calls. But there was no applause; no cheers were heard from the audience. All were ready to head for the exits, to step into warmth and sunshine. And yet the languid cold hung on in the air. Spring would come, but when?

 

Those charged with overseeing the reformation of the debilitated state were shuffled around by the chief executive. It was a strategic move that allowed one cabinet head to be exchanged for an expelled other so that only one senate confirmation hearing would be required instead of two. The head clown of civilian intelligence moved over to take the secretary of state’s position, while another clown, this one a female, was moved up. She would undergo the senate’s scrutiny. If there was torture in her past she may have a rough ride.

 

Other heads were expected to roll before the stage could be set. Military tribunals were being readied. The gradual education of the populace proceeded, in spite of the distinct lack of reliable information being provided by a compromised press. In fact, the utter nonsense coming from that quarter was the disinformation that caused the disconnect in understanding. The People needed to know the extent of their betrayal. And though the Communists, the true dissimulators, were certainly practiced in their dark arts, they were being methodically exposed by a new head of state who instilled meaning in his every gesture. His resiliency was being counted on by anonymous patriots across the land.

 

We must succeed! whispered Harland to himself.

 

This true leader had risen up to cleanse the ship of state. Harland could see parallels to Weimar Germany in his own nation. America had become debauched—so much so that its people were going stark raving mad. Their language had gotten debased; the discourse had sunk to the lowest levels ever encountered in his or any American’s lifetime. It made a man wonder. The ad hominem attacks, the cursing and swearing, the closed-down ideological mindset of the hard left—it was a nightmare from which we all wished we might awaken. Still, it wouldn’t end, not until quite a few were rounded up and carted off.

 

Only the threat of incarceration and the death penalty might silence the mob. Civil unrest lay dead ahead. In the meantime, Harland’s thoughts reassessed things as the recapitulation of history played itself out in his mind. The obvious parallels of Fearless Leader to Adolfus Hitlerias were disturbing to most. That was due to the deeply entrenched conditioning of all generations that still boomed and echoed loudly from the 20^th Century into our own 21^st: Hitler=Nazi=Right Wing Fascism=Evil Incarnate=Brutish Anti-Semite=>Satan/ the Devil<=Embrace its opposite=Left Wing Socialism=Communism= Administrative Nanny State=A Disarmed Populace=More Regulations=Deep State Triumph of NWO!

 

Non merci! cried Harland, non merci!

 

Given the dead weight of the “Hitler/Nazi” demonization, it was baggage too heavy for anyone to lift—or was it? Hitler’s Third Reich was just another state that had stood up to evil, to forces that wanted to destroy a People, a nation, an ordered society and culture that had been a jewel in the crown of Western civilization.

 

Germany had produced music, art, industry. It had a proud and enviable history. And it had stood up to the Bolshevik onslaught, the Communist incursion, the Judaic scourge, a savage pounding by the Anglo-American-Allied military industrial complex—it had endured through all of the murderous battering and bruising of its national psyche, the brutalizing and rape of its women, the brain drain of its best and brightest, and the wimpification of its beaten populace.

 

As such, Germany was a beacon, an example to be studied. It was not some freakish brute unleashed upon the world to devour it whole, as propagandists made it out to be. It was not filled with demonic white men who were titillated by torture and killing and hatred. It did its best to defend itself against a calculated and organized effort to stamp it out from the family of nations. And it made a noble stand against all odds and survived...barely.

 

Those same forces that had crushed it in the public relations realm and in the real world of terror bombing and fire, persisted after 1945. They went on to raise up a demon, calling it the European Union, and made Germany the financial heart of it; in 2005 the EU installed Angela Merkel (who appears to be related by blood to the former Führer) as chancellor, just after the first German pope took office on Hitler's birthday, April 20. This sort of in-your-face, hidden-in-plain-sight “poetic justice” is the calling card of those demonic forces, spelled out in their own occult twilight language; their Luciferian performance at the opening of the Gotthard base tunnel in Switzerland, the longest and deepest in the world, and the CERN abomination—these are the reformulations, re-enactments, if you will, of the Trinity atomic bomb detonation, assisted by the Jet Propulsion Lab of Crowleyite Satanist John Whiteside “Jack” Parsons…even Great Britain proved its collusion by putting on its 2012 London Illuminati Olympics mega-spectacle…

 

But Harland was wandering off on tangential forays. He returns now to his discourse on the afterglow of the Third Reich.

 

What is the legacy of Hitler’s National Socialist Germany? Harland’s take on this subject had not quite “jelled.” But he had enough banging around in his head to throw out some inklings—and who isn’t fond of an inkling?

 

As mentioned previously, the term “Nazi” was a slur upon the German state and it stuck. No one can talk about National Socialist Germany, the Germany between 1933 and 1945, without using the term “Nazi” Germany. “Nazi” has come to mean “brute fascist anti-Semite.” Upon hearing the word “Nazi,” one’s mind is triggered and transformed immediately.  And of course the Orwellian word-masters depend upon this Pavlovian-type response. But we must dig deeper.

 

The American propaganda machine went into overtime to drill the term “Nazi” into the psyches of people worldwide. By all means possible, “Nazi” had to be identified with “evil.” The primary means of doing so was to invent gas chambers and ovens that killed six million Jews (and in particular, innocent Jewish women and children, of course). Everyone knows the playbook by now—The Diary of Anne Frank transmuted into Schindler’s List. But it’s a playbook that has become ever more frayed, and more and more exposed, since the wide dissemination of facts started becoming available on the Internet. Sleuth-hounds debunked the sloppy work of propagandists of “concentration camps” and the so-called “Holocaust,” so that today, any reasonable researcher can deduce the fraud that was perpetuated in the name of sanctifying Jews. By this ruse they claim eternal victimhood, deserving of never-ending reparations from shamed and guilty parties: all of the so-called “goyim” must bear responsibility—come one and all and worship at the altar of “Holocaustinity.”

 

Non merci! cries Harland yet again.

 

And so, at the outset, there are two versions of so-called “Nazis.” There is the National Socialist version: the organized, efficient group of government reformers who assisted in reclaiming the honor and dignity of its People by providing needed measures and resources to recover from the outside depredations of sinister forces. Their intention was to get reconstituted after their “dismemberment” at the hands of those forces and to stabilize their nation, under traditional values of God and family.

 

Then there is (what Harland calls) the “Hollywood version Nazis.” These are the “Nazis” we were taught to hate and despise: monstrous and tyrannical, black-booted killers who reveled in organized torture and extermination, and were essentially devils incarnate who aggressively attacked all of the countries around them as they lusted after world domination. Beware: these “Nazis” might resurrect themselves at any time. So be ready to call them out and to beat them down mercilessly should they try!

 

Dualistic thinking demands that we choose sides; that we choose either that “Nazis” were actually good or were totally bad. By this infantile approach one would fall directly into the arms of the propagandist dissimulators of truth, i.e., if one showed any inclination against the definition found in their own playbook. (This Hollywood Nazi characterization has, of course, been made manifest throughout the world by their Bernaysian mind control methods so that the vast majority who accept such "conventional wisdom" would be called upon and arrayed against any "apostates.")

 

Once again the question is asked: Could the truth be somewhere “in-between”?—or something quite altogether different than we imagine?

 

Harland intends to pick this apart—and he will! The reason for doing so is for the purpose of using the analysis to determine how the socio-political world “developed,” er, devolved, in the aftermath of WWII. Hang onto your Jughead hats. It will be a bumpy ride, though it promises to be a fascinating tour of the abyss into which humanity has fallen and can’t get up. Hold on, it’s coming.

 Picking It All Apart

 

World War II ended after the Allied forces converged upon Berlin in the Spring of 1945. Shortly afterwards FDR, Churchill and Stalin met in Potsdam to determine Germany’s fate. Germany was carved up as if it were a turkey served up on platters to the victors.

 

The common German People who were still standing after WWII would be sanitized of their “Nazi” past and their minds conditioned to serve their new masters. They were essentially enslaved, similar to what the Treaty of Versailles had done to them a few decades before (but now, instead of deprivation they would be stuffed to excess with both Communist fascism and secular materialism).

 

What became of the “Nazi” Party, the SS, the Gestapo, and their vast and intricate intelligence network? What became of the advanced scientists, the physicists, the engineers? These constituted the great prize of WWII. The world came to understand that, just as with their nation, most of these educated and accomplished German elite were divvied up too, mostly between the Americans and the Soviets.   

 

Would the surviving Germans of the Third Reich come to embrace their “Hollywood Nazi” characterization? That is, had an "indwelling projection/ acceptance process” already begun to work upon them during 1933-1945? Harland believes this is the key question if one is to start picking apart the issue in order to determine who today’s Nazis truly are. He leaves the issue of psyches to psychologists, and only makes some observations and asks some questions.

 

In retrospect, we know that by 1945 German know-how was on the verge of nuclear research, time travel, and alternative energy that allowed for the construction, e.g., of UFOs. Big stuff. Since the 20^th Century there has always been talk of governments back-engineering ET technology or perhaps working side-by-side with ETs. Who can know anything for sure?—certainly not the uninitiated. Still, there have been leakers and whistleblowers, death bed confessions, and the like, concerning a secret space program and great advances that can only be imagined by the common man and woman.

 

Harland took a deep breath, then exhaled. He looked out the window into the darkness before sun-up. We can’t see the stars as we could before all the light pollution. And we can’t see the truth either for the same reason—Lucifer’s “light.” Moderns scoff at the idea, uninitiated moderns that is. They don’t know and don’t care about the Devil anymore; he’s just a mythological creature with horns and a tail who holds a pitchfork and lives in a fiery domain known as “hell,” another myth. Why, educated human beings let go of that “Medieval belief system” long ago. Tut, tut. (But what about those Medieval times, those Middle, so-called “Dark” Ages?)

 

According to Harland, here is what happened: Some stayed and integrated into the new System, some stayed and became agents working against the new System, and some left. First let us examine those who left.

 

We have already mentioned those elite scientists, et al., who were secreted away and indentured to the USA and the USSR. These poor slobs must have done the best they could do either to assist their new masters or to sabotage them. Undoubtedly, plenty has been written about them. Go have a look.

 

Adolf Hitler’s purported suicide was a ruse. South America (primarily Argentina) became the new home for him and some other high echelon associates and assistants. There he lived to a ripe old age. Dreams of a New Reich more or less vanished with the passing of the Führer, I believe sometime in the 1960s. (Or did they?)

 

What became of the “Nazi gold and other looted treasure”? It was warehoused mostly in Switzerland, wasn’t it? Wherever it was stored, assets from the period of the Third Reich were strategically injected into the financial system. Exactly when, where, how and who was involved I have no idea. Harland only knows that “them that gots is them that gets.” Surely fortunes were made during and after the war. And after 1945 a comradery remained among the old Third Reichers that certainly must have been preserved and passed on to their progeny. (By the way, if that Luciferian performance to celebrate the new tunnel in Switzerland is any indicator of the Swiss who run things there today, then they are surely corrupt to the bone and lost to that fiendish Adversary.)

 

What is the nature of these “people of the German diaspora”? Were they to stick by their time-tested traditions of God and family? Or would they become poisoned by hate from home-sickness and a bitter rage against those who had seized and corrupted their homeland yet again? Would they become seduced by their wealth and (secret) privilege into a debauched and elitist mentality? And would they, as a result, feed the New World Order with every sick and poison pill imaginable (possibly in order to crash it)? Do they have a secret base in Antarctica and are they really sharing a whole other "dimension in living" down there among ETs? Again, there are rumors, but I have no idea. There are all sorts of theories and speculations out there.

 

But those who left the Fatherland had a big job to accomplish without the comfort, safety and security of being on their native soil. Whatever they got up to and however they did what they did, Harland thinks there were some good and some bad among them, as there are among all groupings of people. But to continue…

 

What about those of more privileged status who stayed behind? Again, Harland reckons that they and their talents were recruited by private and public interests and incorporated accordingly. Certainly some were recruited into the new CIA and KGB and into other intelligence services run by the former Allies but staged in Germany or thereabouts. Some intelligence experts reportedly became operatives for Interpol, headquartered in France, and actually ran Interpol into the late 1960s.

 

Suffice it to say that such stay-behinds re-incorporated themselves back into German/European society, mostly as businessmen and professional people. Their inner loyalties were likely mixed, depending on how much of the “new, improved” consensual reality and culture trance they either accepted or rejected.

 

But in our current world we keep hearing about Nazis. Often they are associated with the traitorous Bush family, which of course extends into the Clinton-Obama crime syndicate. And what is the connection between these Nazis and the Templars? Are they one and the same group or did they “meld”? If they are separate and distinct from one another, what differentiates them? Can anyone know the answers, for sure, to any of these questions? Harland thinks someone knows how everything fits together (and it’s probably not Benjamin Fulford).

 

The bottom line here is that if anyone ever got a bad rap it was those involved in the Third Reich. They were branded with the term “Nazi.” That brand became their brand, and was then co-opted to refer to any and all “fascists.” Moreover, it was used again—as a psy-op—to convince Germans that they were all “Nazis.” Some accepted the branding and were filled with self-hate and shame; some embraced the Hollywood “Nazi” brand characteristics, to their detriment; but some, perhaps, just played along with the NWO branding “script” while knowing in their hearts that they were devoted to God and family in the same way that the Third Reich actually was, warts and all.   

 

These days we hear of a “Khazarian Nazi cabal.” Are we to believe that some Judaics have embraced (what we have been taught is) the very antithesis of Jewry? Research it all, if you are able. Good luck.

 

The Communist fascists of today are the real Hollywood Nazis—the would-be victors of WWII and their neo-Marxist utopian NWO have become that which they supposedly hate and despise: Nazis, the Hollywood variety. 

 

Harland sighs. Maybe we are back where we started. And maybe geo-politics and finance should be left to the devil-worshippers, rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s.

 

Still, we must treat our country as if it is “Tara,” the fabled plantation in Gone With the Wind. “Don’t sell the land! It’s the only thing that lasts.” Terra, in Latin, in Caesar’s tongue, means “land”=>soil, earth, ground, country. What Hollywood doesn’t tell you by way of that film is that God, the immortal soul, is the only thing that really lasts—and one needs to have a decent and healthy place to raise and nurture a family so that its souls are saved, both for the benefit of humanity and for all eternity. How much more important this is than simply the notion of the love of terra firma.

 

These are the lessons, and this is the legacy of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.